Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BPDB in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bpdb.php on line 183

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-object-cache.php on line 285

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 67

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http_Cookie in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 1633

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Users in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-users.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BP_Roles in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bp-roles.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Auth in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-auth.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 33

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Taxonomy in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-taxonomy.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 26

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::prefix() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 49

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bpdb.php:183) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-templates/genealogias-bb/rss2.php on line 1
The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum » Tag: compositions - Recent Posts http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum » Tag: compositions - Recent Posts en Sun, 26 Jun 2016 02:43:36 +0000 Colonel Trane on "What Kurt tunes might end up as future standards?" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/what-kurt-tunes-might-end-up-as-future-standards#post-709
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:00:02 +0000
Colonel Trane 709@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Zhivago, Use of Light, View from Moscow, Minor Blues, maybe Chords? </p>
Sandemose on "What Kurt tunes might end up as future standards?" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/what-kurt-tunes-might-end-up-as-future-standards#post-708
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:26:54 +0000
Sandemose 708@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Yeah, agree with you Jake, with easy I more meant that the form is easy and well put together. It has this &quot;hit&quot; quality to it (&quot;the Cross&quot;) Solo over the changes is still really hard, for me at least. Someone mentioned &quot;Conception&quot;. I havent touched it already. It seems really hard. Brutal key also, isnt it? </p>
Anonymous on "What Kurt tunes might end up as future standards?" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/what-kurt-tunes-might-end-up-as-future-standards#post-705
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:05:24 +0000
Anonymous 705@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>a lot of standards are standards because they are hard.</p> <p>Giant Steps? </p>
Sandemose on "What Kurt tunes might end up as future standards?" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/what-kurt-tunes-might-end-up-as-future-standards#post-703
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:06:10 +0000
Sandemose 703@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Perhaps &quot;the Cross&quot; as well? It got a quite easy form, and not that difficult head also! I second that on Zhivago. But its so hard :(</p> <p>Best, Sandemose </p>
Neither on "What Kurt tunes might end up as future standards?" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/what-kurt-tunes-might-end-up-as-future-standards#post-701
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:15:54 +0000
Neither 701@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>I agree with Jakehanlon, Zhivago for the same reasons </p>
Anonymous on "What Kurt tunes might end up as future standards?" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/what-kurt-tunes-might-end-up-as-future-standards#post-700
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:48:23 +0000
Anonymous 700@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Zhivago has the best shot of any of them I think by a long shot. Not because the others are not great compositions but it seems to me that it is his most popular composition all around, and that tends to be the biggest factor </p>
Anonymous on "What Kurt tunes might end up as future standards?" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/what-kurt-tunes-might-end-up-as-future-standards#post-699
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:34:28 +0000
Anonymous 699@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Good topic!</p> <p>My suggestions:</p> <p>Zhivago<br /> East Coast Love Affair<br /> Our Secret World </p>
Sandemose on "What Kurt tunes might end up as future standards?" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/what-kurt-tunes-might-end-up-as-future-standards#post-695
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:17:17 +0000
Sandemose 695@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>This is my list: </p> <p>Minor Blues,<br /> Path of the Heart,<br /> Cubism,<br /> Use of Light,<br /> Song for R.C. Man, that one is found on the Village Vanguard bootleg posted here, the second set, third song. I think its THE most beautiful ballad Kurt ever wrote, will it ever be recorded offically? Kurt, ACT?</p> <p>Any more suggestions?</p> <p>Best, sandemose </p>