Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 26

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::prefix() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 49

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php:9) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-templates/genealogias-bb/rss2.php on line 1
The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum » Tag: gauge - Recent Posts http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum » Tag: gauge - Recent Posts en Wed, 29 Jun 2016 01:52:00 +0000 franjpg on "kurt strings" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/kurt-strings#post-13955
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Mon, 16 Feb 2015 07:23:44 +0000
franjpg 13955@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Very helpful , thank you! </p>
lacroix on "kurt strings" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/kurt-strings#post-13954
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Mon, 16 Feb 2015 05:16:58 +0000
lacroix 13954@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>D'Addario EJ21 Nickel Wound 12-52</p> <p>This a two-year old quote from Kurt himself:<br /> "012 d'addario round wounds" </p>
franjpg on "kurt strings" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/kurt-strings#post-13953
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Sun, 15 Feb 2015 19:36:27 +0000
franjpg 13953@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>I would like to know what are Kurt strings preferences in his semi hollow guitars. flatwound or roundbound strings? gauge?<br /> Regards </p>
classiceast on "Sadowsky Tone HELP!" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/sadowsky-tone-help#post-6925
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 17:59:48 +0000
classiceast 6925@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Take a serious look at a nice EQ pedal.<br /> I manage to fatten up my tone on 012 and 016 strings quite a bit with an EQ. </p>
Joxo on "Sadowsky Tone HELP!" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/sadowsky-tone-help#post-6924
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 11:57:42 +0000
Joxo 6924@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Are your e,b,g strings very low adjusted ? Try to get the string a bit higher from the fretboard and se.<br /> Also to get a fat tone with that Kurt type energy u need a heavy large pick.<br /> A stock sadowsky should be fine and do what u ask if its setup right. If it is, then keep on play it to figure it out. A new instrument almost always needs a lot of time to be understod. /j </p>
jorgemg1984 on "Sadowsky Tone HELP!" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/sadowsky-tone-help#post-6922
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 09:10:57 +0000
jorgemg1984 6922@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Good ones jake, don't know why I forgot them! </p>
fakejake on "Sadowsky Tone HELP!" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/sadowsky-tone-help#post-6921
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 08:14:29 +0000
fakejake 6921@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>have you tried raising the pickup height just on the treble side?<br /> i experimented a lot with the pickup and polepiece height on my 335 until i found the 'sweet spot'. </p> <p>another parameter you can experiment with is where you actually pick the strings, closer to the bridge or closer to the neck. again, i feel every guitar has a sweep spot in this regard. </p>
jorgemg1984 on "Sadowsky Tone HELP!" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/sadowsky-tone-help#post-6920
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 06:00:09 +0000
jorgemg1984 6920@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Those two strings are tough to manage in the guitar - I don't like them too fat (spiky) nor too thin (bright). Here's some ideas</p> <p>1) You can keep increasing gauge, I am using 015 019 these days</p> <p>2) A new pickup</p> <p>3) A good EQ pedal that gives you more control over those frequencies</p> <p>4) Have you tried messing with the bass on the amp? The bass fattens the overal tone sometimes.</p> <p>Good luck! </p>
Tazdingooooo on "Sadowsky Tone HELP!" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/sadowsky-tone-help#post-6919
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Sat, 24 Mar 2012 03:23:21 +0000
Tazdingooooo 6919@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>I've recently purchased a Sadowsky Semi-hollow. The craftsmanship is undoubtedly impeccable, the low register is very warm and resonant and the guitar has great responsiveness and sensitivity.</p> <p>However, compared to my old Ibanez Gibson ES 335 copy, the unwound B and E strings on the Sadowsky sound a bit thin despite the great clarity. I've increased the string gauge from 12 to 13 (12's sound and feel like 10's on this guitar for some reason), raised the pole pieces, played with the EQ, but still failed to fatten the sound of these two strings. I'm looking for the tone that Kurt has on his Untitled Improvisation video (clear and textured but still fat). In that video, his high strings sound like they have higher tension, and thicker and "grabbier" (I know this comes down partially to technique).</p> <p>I've gone to the luthier and tried on a few heavier bridges and tailpieces, since the issue was acoustic. They succeeded in fattening out the tone, but also dulled it down. In the end I opted to keep the sensitivity of the Sadowsky tailpiece and bridge.</p> <p>ANY IDEAS?? </p>
JorgeRubiales on "Interesting string dilemma" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/interesting-string-dilemma#post-4316
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:56:43 +0000
JorgeRubiales 4316@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Hey everybody!</p> <p>I&#39;ve been going through the string issue again, I put .012 flats but I find it too much on the bottom, and maybe not enough on top. My ideal set would be something like .014-.049/.052 at most, but I can&#39;t find any set like this, and the ones similar are very expensive.</p> <p>I was thinking if I could put a .014 B string and .018 G string instead of my E and B strings, to achieve the desired gauge.</p> <p>Someone tried something like this? My actual concern is if the string would tune to pitch without breaking. I know the guitar will hold up the tension, because I&#39;ll be lowering the low strings gauge.</p> <p>Thanks! </p>