Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 26

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::prefix() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 49

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php:9) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-templates/genealogias-bb/rss2.php on line 1
The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum » Topic: file sharing issue revisited! (a very good article!!) http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum » Topic: file sharing issue revisited! (a very good article!!) en Sat, 25 Jun 2016 19:28:42 +0000 Matt on "file sharing issue revisited! (a very good article!!)" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/file-sharing-issue-revisited-a-very-good-article#post-7936
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:31:29 +0000
Matt 7936@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p><blockquote>Of the 75,000 albums released in 2010 only 2,000 sold more than 5,000 copies. Only 1,000 sold more than 10,000 copies. </blockquote></p> <p>wow.... </p>
egav on "file sharing issue revisited! (a very good article!!)" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/file-sharing-issue-revisited-a-very-good-article#post-7922
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Wed, 27 Jun 2012 19:06:13 +0000
egav 7922@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Funny how Lefsetz disabled comments. </p>
Quintricacy on "file sharing issue revisited! (a very good article!!)" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/file-sharing-issue-revisited-a-very-good-article#post-7882
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:21:10 +0000
Quintricacy 7882@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Seems like Lefsetz completely missed the point. </p>
gleepglop on "file sharing issue revisited! (a very good article!!)" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/file-sharing-issue-revisited-a-very-good-article#post-7881
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Sat, 23 Jun 2012 13:48:56 +0000
gleepglop 7881@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Lefsetz's "rebuttal" is so full of fallacies and other logical holes that I can't believe anyone takes it remotely seriously. Practically every sentence initiates a new fallacy; the whole thing could be used for an assignment in a beginning logic class (I emphasize beginning, since usually fallacious arguments are more subtle).</p> <p> Lowrey wrote a nuanced, logical article about the ethics of how people are relating to music and musicians. Lefsetz's response is to try to distract from the issue of ethics with as many incoherent arguments as he can. </p>
themawt71 on "file sharing issue revisited! (a very good article!!)" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/file-sharing-issue-revisited-a-very-good-article#post-7880
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Sat, 23 Jun 2012 13:12:46 +0000
themawt71 7880@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>the first link is a letter from musician david lowry to a young woman who published an article at npr about why she doesn't pay for music.<br /> it's one of the best arguments i've read in defense of musicians. </p> <p>the next link is someone who responds to david lowry. it's a good response to lowry but i still fall on more on lowry's side. </p> <p>i definitely am not interested in any animosity or fights but i would love to discuss both sides of the issue. </p> <p>what do y'all think?</p> <p><a href="http://thetrichordist.wordpress.com/2012/06/18/letter-to-emily-white-at-npr-all-songs-considered/" rel="nofollow">http://thetrichordist.wordpress.com/2012/06/18/letter-to-emily-white-at-npr-all-songs-considered/</a></p> <p><a href="http://lefsetz.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/2012/06/18/the-david-lowery-screed/" rel="nofollow">http://lefsetz.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/2012/06/18/the-david-lowery-screed/</a> </p>