Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BPDB in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bpdb.php on line 183

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-object-cache.php on line 285

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 67

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http_Cookie in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 1633

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Users in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-users.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BP_Roles in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bp-roles.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Auth in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-auth.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 33

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Taxonomy in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-taxonomy.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 26

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::prefix() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 49

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bpdb.php:183) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-templates/genealogias-bb/rss2.php on line 1
The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum » Topic: if kurt responded more.... http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum » Topic: if kurt responded more.... en Sat, 30 Jul 2016 20:41:44 +0000 Quintricacy on "if kurt responded more...." http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/if-kurt-responded-more#post-2992
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Thu, 14 Oct 2010 05:44:29 +0000
Quintricacy 2992@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>^ Haha, nice! </p>
Kapteinar on "if kurt responded more...." http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/if-kurt-responded-more#post-2986
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:13:40 +0000
Kapteinar 2986@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Only... This is real! </p>
jseaberry on "if kurt responded more...." http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/if-kurt-responded-more#post-2983
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:35:06 +0000
jseaberry 2983@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>This is close to having the tablets handed to us on the mountain! </p>
kurtisrosenwinkel on "if kurt responded more...." http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/if-kurt-responded-more#post-2982
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:52:33 +0000
kurtisrosenwinkel 2982@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>hi everyone,<br /> i try to monitor whats going on on this board, and try to respond when i am asked something directly or if i feel like i have input to the thread. but for y&#39;all i&#39;ll try to be more involved :-)<br /> and redbeard- you are definitely projecting.</p> <p>best,<br /> k </p>
Lasse S on "if kurt responded more...." http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/if-kurt-responded-more#post-2911
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Wed, 06 Oct 2010 05:16:06 +0000
Lasse S 2911@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>edited .. </p>
Sandemose on "if kurt responded more...." http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/if-kurt-responded-more#post-2909
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Wed, 06 Oct 2010 02:25:36 +0000
Sandemose 2909@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Redbeard: I dont think so, I dont know him, but I really dont think so.</p> <p>Best, Sandemose </p>
Redbeard on "if kurt responded more...." http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/if-kurt-responded-more#post-2906
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Wed, 06 Oct 2010 01:34:03 +0000
Redbeard 2906@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Maybe I&#39;m projecting, but Kurt seems painfully shy to me. At least outside of his social comfort zone. </p>
patfarlow on "if kurt responded more...." http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/if-kurt-responded-more#post-2901
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Tue, 05 Oct 2010 10:30:22 +0000
patfarlow 2901@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>it is currently a fan board and thats ok, however I and many others realize the communication possibilities the web provide. He doesn&#39;t check twitter or reply to most questions, maybe a FAQ section would help minimalize redundant questions letting him focus on novel academic questions?<br /> just a thought</p> <p>my GF does yoga and some of her heroes in the field actually respond and excite her and others. you can imagine how this augments the fan base for the web savy yogis. </p> <p>alot of people on this board would pay 50-100$ for a small skype lesson with the master. Im just sharing media centric ideas that pull in revenue for him while growing his notoriety </p> <p>again<br /> with respect </p>
Sandemose on "if kurt responded more...." http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/if-kurt-responded-more#post-2897
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Tue, 05 Oct 2010 02:29:40 +0000
Sandemose 2897@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Gary Willis have a similar forum called Ask Willis (he will kill you if you call him Gary, only his mother does/did that), either way, he likes updates it four times a year or so, answering a bunch of questions. I think Robben Ford does this, perhaps Scott Henderson too? </p> <p>Of course it would be cool if Kurt was more active, but I think that if the discussion is intresting enaugh he will jump right into it, but most of the time, we guys/gals often sort things out quite well. Wommusic/ACT is, at least I think so, very active when it comes to handle stuff fast and also answering Kurt related questions.</p> <p>I dont think this is a board mainly for us communicating with Kurt, but rather with eachother about all and everything, Kurt related or not. I think this forum is about sharing knowledge, and if its made in Kurts name, I just dig it even more.</p> <p>Best, Sandemose </p>
jazznan on "if kurt responded more...." http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/if-kurt-responded-more#post-2896
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:55:15 +0000
jazznan 2896@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>he could dictate to someone and they could type, yes it would be cool, but even cooler would be that harmony book! anything? </p>
Basile865 on "if kurt responded more...." http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/if-kurt-responded-more#post-2895
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Mon, 04 Oct 2010 23:06:50 +0000
Basile865 2895@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>It&#39;d be great if he was easy to get a hold of to question frequently, but on the other hand, how many amazing artists out there like Kurt have a website with a forum that they do sometimes respond on. He&#39;s busy making the music we love. </p>
patfarlow on "if kurt responded more...." http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/if-kurt-responded-more#post-2893
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Mon, 04 Oct 2010 20:12:29 +0000
patfarlow 2893@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>this board would rule. it would be a nice gesture to take 5 minutes out of his day once in a while for the kids here that bought the books, cds, and visit shows. even some occasional lesson ideas a scale or somthin </p> <p>I know hes busy, but so are we and i typed this in 2 minutes.....</p> <p>love ya kurt<br /> with respect </p>