Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BPDB in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bpdb.php on line 183

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-object-cache.php on line 285

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 67

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http_Cookie in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 1633

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Users in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-users.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BP_Roles in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bp-roles.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Auth in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-auth.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 33

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Taxonomy in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-taxonomy.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 26

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::prefix() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 49

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bpdb.php:183) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-templates/genealogias-bb/rss2.php on line 1
The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum » Topic: Pentatonic "discovery"... http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum » Topic: Pentatonic "discovery"... en Tue, 28 Jun 2016 05:58:11 +0000 thoeller on "Pentatonic "discovery"..." http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/pentatonic-discovery#post-3861
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:53:37 +0000
thoeller 3861@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <br />
Anonymous on "Pentatonic "discovery"..." http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/pentatonic-discovery#post-1725
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Mon, 07 Jun 2010 03:23:34 +0000
Anonymous 1725@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>I did find that one a while ago---try it iver a F$-7b5 or D7 #11. After I stumbled on that one the other one I found was:</p> <p>--------------------------------------------------------------5------9<br /> ---------------------------------------------------5----8--------------<br /> ---------------------------------------6----7-------------------------<br /> --------------------------5-----7--------------------------------------<br /> ---------4----5----7--------------------------------------------------<br /> ----5------------------------------------------------------------------</p> <p>I&#39;ve heard Jam Hammer play this with The mahavishnu Orch. Sounds good over A7 but is sounds really cool over a G7#11<br /> I guess all of this info is just up in the air waiting for people to discover or re-discover it. </p>
Sandemose on "Pentatonic "discovery"..." http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/pentatonic-discovery#post-1723
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:48:16 +0000
Sandemose 1723@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Hi folks.</p> <p>I recently stumbled across something that never accoured to me, but probably did to people at this forum. Ive been working with pentatoncis recently and I started replacing the minor 7th with a major 7th instead. The basic pentatonic shape became like this:</p> <p>---------------------------------------5--8---<br /> --------------------------------5--9---------<br /> -------------------------5--7---------------<br /> -----------------6--7-----------------------<br /> ---------5--7----------------------------<br /> ---5--8------------------------------------</p> <p>I love the sound, and the playability of the shape. I think it sounds awesome over a F major chord (esp. over tune like Solar, with the #9 in the melody over the F major7 chord). It sounds great as a major7 #5 sound over Cmaj7#5, or why not over a G#7 altered. Anyone experimented with this before? Any cool applications to share?</p> <p>Best, Sandemose </p>