Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 26

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::prefix() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 49

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php:9) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-templates/genealogias-bb/rss2.php on line 1
The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum » Topic: Transcribing entire solos vs. parts. http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum » Topic: Transcribing entire solos vs. parts. en Sat, 02 Jul 2016 07:25:29 +0000 arewolfe on "Transcribing entire solos vs. parts." http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/transcribing-entire-solos-vs-parts#post-10921
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:44:40 +0000
arewolfe 10921@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>I find transcribing an entire solo is really helpful for my dexterity on the instrument. When you play something that many times repetitively, it's a fresh way to work on getting comfortable with new movements in your fretting hand (and sometimes your picking hand).</p> <p>I was never good at taking a single lick, playing it in all keys, and trying to incorporate it into my "bag of tricks." The only time I transcribe a small part of a guitar solo is if I'm confused or curious about how the soloist achieved a particular sound, and how they fingered it on the neck. </p>
jorgemg1984 on "Transcribing entire solos vs. parts." http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/transcribing-entire-solos-vs-parts#post-10920
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Tue, 26 Feb 2013 06:13:55 +0000
jorgemg1984 10920@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Do both or do the one you think it's better for you. Only you can answer your question. </p>
dexterfm on "Transcribing entire solos vs. parts." http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/transcribing-entire-solos-vs-parts#post-10919
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Tue, 26 Feb 2013 02:44:42 +0000
dexterfm 10919@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>An interesting question.<br /> Although it may sometimes seem tedious to transcribe four pages if one is initially only interested in 8 bars, I usually always support the notion of transcribing the solo in its entirety. As you said, context is crucial and understanding how he/she got to that particular sweet spot in the solo is, for me at least, only possible if I take a look at the solo in its completion. There are no absolute truths and therefor I find it legitimate to just take out a particular line if that is what sticks out to you. Often at times however, I didn't realize how great a solo was until I had checked the whole thing out!<br /> Just my two cents. </p>
guitar1025 on "Transcribing entire solos vs. parts." http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/transcribing-entire-solos-vs-parts#post-10918
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:10:02 +0000
guitar1025 10918@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Hey guys,</p> <p>Question for those out there;</p> <p>When you're transcribing for the benefit of vocabulary, do you find it better to transcribe an entire solo and pick out your favorite parts. . .or to pick your favorite parts out of the solo and <em>only</em> transcribe those parts?</p> <p>I feel like with the first way, you get a lot of the context of a particular line, which a lot of times makes a world of difference in your understanding of how it works. With the latter, I feel like you cut through a lot of the red tape; just deal with what you want to use.</p> <p>Want to know your thoughts/ideas/suggestions!</p> <p>As always, thanks guys!! </p>