Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BPDB in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bpdb.php on line 183

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-object-cache.php on line 285

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 67

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http_Cookie in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 1633

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Users in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-users.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BP_Roles in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bp-roles.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Auth in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-auth.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 33

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Taxonomy in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-taxonomy.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 26

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::prefix() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 49

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bpdb.php:183) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-templates/genealogias-bb/rss2.php on line 1
The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum » Topic: Two Sleepy People Approach http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum » Topic: Two Sleepy People Approach en Thu, 28 Jul 2016 18:19:13 +0000 harmnobean on "Two Sleepy People Approach" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/two-sleepy-people-approach#post-4231
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Fri, 01 Apr 2011 08:30:46 +0000
harmnobean 4231@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>If you want more cool ideas for how to resolve your lines to extensions, check out some Charlie Parker as well!</p> <p>edit: and for a more current guy, Rich Perry is great for this as well </p>
bingefeller on "Two Sleepy People Approach" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/two-sleepy-people-approach#post-4229
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Fri, 01 Apr 2011 07:53:39 +0000
bingefeller 4229@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Jazzbum - great reply. That whole Hancock / Abercrombie target note thing is something that I hadn&#39;t heard before and I&#39;m gonna go and try to read up a little more on that. I think that guitarists have the information that the only target notes are R 3rd 5th 7th etc. </p>
jazzbum on "Two Sleepy People Approach" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/two-sleepy-people-approach#post-4224
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:37:17 +0000
jazzbum 4224@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Personally, I would play the melody a lot, maybe for a few choruses until it is totally in my head then start to embellish it little by little. I think the key is to make those melody lines very strong in your ears so that when you improvise they become natural target notes. The other thing I like to do is play melodies without regard for the changes, pure by ear playing, which can be hard to be satisfied with but can really force you to listen to the chords, as opposed to thinking about their quality and what scale works over what etc. </p> <p>As far as target notes vs arpeggios, I kind of take the approach of choosing my target notes sort of like Herbie Hancock and John Abercrombie. The idea is that any tone in a chord (even extensions) can be target notes, or resolutions. If I am playing over Cmaj7 I may be just as likely to resolve to D as I would be to E. Both of these guys would say, it doesn&#39;t necessarily matter where you are, as long as you know where you are going. This idea also ties into the melody being the key, if it is strong enough in your head you will tend to resolve to notes and lines within it, which in my opinion tends to put your improv in a nice context as oppsoed to just being lines. I try to think of sounds, intervals, and for practice scale degrees when I&#39;m imporvising. I don&#39;t think scalar because I always felt like that ended up being mindless noodling for me (like choose a postion, now dick around). </p> <p>Just my 2 cents. </p>
jorgemg1984 on "Two Sleepy People Approach" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/two-sleepy-people-approach#post-4221
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:24:13 +0000
jorgemg1984 4221@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>I never understood the scale vs arpeggio theory... I think of scale / chord degrees and they can form consecutive steps, arpeggios or wider leaps, having all degrees at your disposal is essential (and hard) </p>
bingefeller on "Two Sleepy People Approach" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/two-sleepy-people-approach#post-4220
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:43:00 +0000
bingefeller 4220@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>When you guys are playing scales do you think of target notes as much as opposed to playing arpeggios? </p>
jorgemg1984 on "Two Sleepy People Approach" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/two-sleepy-people-approach#post-4216
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Thu, 31 Mar 2011 05:19:42 +0000
jorgemg1984 4216@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Why do you have to play scales on a tonal center and arpegios on modulations? </p>
JorgeRubiales on "Two Sleepy People Approach" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/two-sleepy-people-approach#post-4214
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Thu, 31 Mar 2011 04:17:48 +0000
JorgeRubiales 4214@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Also try and find the tona centers. Look at the key signature, its E flat. Which chords on the A belong to that key? etc.</p> <p>That way you&#39;ll know when you can use a scale (lots of chords of the same key), or have to survive with arpeggios (lots of modulation) </p>
david6strings on "Two Sleepy People Approach" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/two-sleepy-people-approach#post-4209
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:58:11 +0000
david6strings 4209@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>the structure in A section and the number of measures in the tune is like a rhythm change ( in the third line i guess the 1. mark must be a 2. i think? yeah this section arpeggios, pentatonic and the eb major scale and the dominant bb scale for the even measures. in b section i recommend the arpeggios if you don&#39;t know whats going on, i think that way is easier. good luck. im dealing with oleo right know. </p>
bingefeller on "Two Sleepy People Approach" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/two-sleepy-people-approach#post-4208
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:27:30 +0000
bingefeller 4208@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>I was wondering how you folks would approach playing over the standard Two Sleepy People? The chords I use are:</p> <p><img src="http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/1554/twosleepypeople.jpg" /></p> <p>Hopefully my chart is readable to you. :)</p> <p>The reason I ask is because I&#39;m a rock player mostly and I always find it difficult to navigate changes whilst trying to spell them out yet keeping things flowing nicely! Would you use your pentatonic approach to this tune or would you think in terms of arpeggios? </p>