Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BPDB in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bpdb.php on line 183

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-object-cache.php on line 285

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 67

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http_Cookie in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 1633

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Users in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-users.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BP_Roles in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bp-roles.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Auth in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-auth.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 33

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Taxonomy in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-taxonomy.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 26

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::prefix() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 49

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bpdb.php:183) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-templates/genealogias-bb/rss2.php on line 1
The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum » Topic: XOTIC X-Blender vs Lehle Parallel L http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum » Topic: XOTIC X-Blender vs Lehle Parallel L en Wed, 27 Jul 2016 09:39:12 +0000 djcuvcuv on "XOTIC X-Blender vs Lehle Parallel L" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/xotic-x-blender-vs-lehle-parallel-l#post-8319
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Wed, 15 Aug 2012 23:09:50 +0000
djcuvcuv 8319@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Thanks for all the info guys. This does help. Because I intend of getting a standalone EQ pedal, and the WetBox is absurdly expensive, I think that the Lehle is my go to for the moment. </p> <p>Kurt, if you happen to stumble upon this thread, would you be willing to give me a quick breakdown of why you've used different parallel mixers and what your thoughts are on each? If you can recommend one which you feel has the highest quality, please do so.</p> <p>Thanks man </p>
Joxo on "XOTIC X-Blender vs Lehle Parallel L" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/xotic-x-blender-vs-lehle-parallel-l#post-8315
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:32:18 +0000
Joxo 8315@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Hey<br /> Got the x-blender and unsed the Lehle. They are both good. Cant say thats they sound any diffrent wich is kind of the point. It`s a mixer ! Anyways the x-blenders have a booster and a Eq that is very usefull. For me anyways.</p> <p>By the way , i think a lot of people use them in the wrong way. The effect u sent in to it must be all wet . If its not you get phase issues. </p> <p>Good luck</p> <p>/J </p>
jorgemg1984 on "XOTIC X-Blender vs Lehle Parallel L" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/xotic-x-blender-vs-lehle-parallel-l#post-8312
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Wed, 15 Aug 2012 04:32:22 +0000
jorgemg1984 8312@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Kurt is using these now I think</p> <p><a href="http://www.thegigrig.com/acatalog/AFXL_WetBox.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thegigrig.com/acatalog/AFXL_WetBox.html</a></p> <p>The Lehle is good, never tried the Xotic. </p>
djcuvcuv on "XOTIC X-Blender vs Lehle Parallel L" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/xotic-x-blender-vs-lehle-parallel-l#post-8306
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:19:30 +0000
djcuvcuv 8306@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>I am in the market to buy a parallel/bypass pedal such as the aforementioned. I can't find a comparison of the two anywhere and I was wondering if anyone has any experience with both and can give a comparison of two. Sound quality/integrity is my foremost concern.<br /> I know the Lehle is roughly 100 USD more expensive than the X-Blender, and it also does not have the EQ functionality like the X-Blender. Is the sound quality really so much better in the Lehle that despite it having less functionality than its competitor, it still sells for 100 USD more? What could account for the price disparity?</p> <p>Any and all info is much obliged.</p> <p>Thanks </p>