Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BPDB in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bpdb.php on line 183

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-object-cache.php on line 285

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 67

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http_Cookie in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 1633

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Users in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-users.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BP_Roles in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bp-roles.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Auth in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-auth.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 33

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Taxonomy in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-taxonomy.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 26

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::prefix() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 49

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bpdb.php:183) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-templates/genealogias-bb/rss2.php on line 1
The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum » Topic: ZT luchbox Jr. Good clean tone for practicing? http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum » Topic: ZT luchbox Jr. Good clean tone for practicing? en Sun, 26 Jun 2016 06:20:28 +0000 jamacy77 on "ZT luchbox Jr. Good clean tone for practicing?" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/zt-luchbox-jr-good-clean-tone-for-practicing#post-11594
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Thu, 01 Aug 2013 23:57:13 +0000
jamacy77 11594@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>I would get the acoustic Lunchbox if I were you...but... give it a try before you buy. </p>
PFDP on "ZT luchbox Jr. Good clean tone for practicing?" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/zt-luchbox-jr-good-clean-tone-for-practicing#post-11579
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Tue, 30 Jul 2013 17:36:52 +0000
PFDP 11579@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Thanks guys,</p> <p>I asked about the jr because it is so small and portable that is very suitable for what I need, But I hate those small amps with horrible sound.</p> <p>For playing live I use a Henriksen or a twin reverb ( lately always the Henriksen because of the weight).</p> <p>So what I looking for it is just a very small amp to practice alone, with a backing track maybe. The Jr is the smaller and cheaper of the ZT models...</p> <p>I have an archtop and a semihollow, but as I said...it is for practicing use only!!! :-) </p>
arewolfe on "ZT luchbox Jr. Good clean tone for practicing?" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/zt-luchbox-jr-good-clean-tone-for-practicing#post-11578
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Mon, 29 Jul 2013 23:16:50 +0000
arewolfe 11578@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>They are great amps. I use mine on my solo gig because it's 40 pounds lighter than my Supersonic. Definitely suitable for practicing. </p>
jamacy77 on "ZT luchbox Jr. Good clean tone for practicing?" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/zt-luchbox-jr-good-clean-tone-for-practicing#post-11577
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Mon, 29 Jul 2013 22:13:12 +0000
jamacy77 11577@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Dear PFDP,</p> <p>I own two ZT amps, the acoustic Lunchbox<br /> <a href="http://www.ztamplifiers.com/products/lunchbox_acoustic.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ztamplifiers.com/products/lunchbox_acoustic.html</a></p> <p>and the one for electric guitars.<br /> <a href="http://www.ztamplifiers.com/products/lunchbox.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ztamplifiers.com/products/lunchbox.html</a></p> <p>I don't know the jr. model.</p> <p>For what they are, I'd say they're great amps for low volume and practicing. However, I'd NEVER bring that to a concert or a louder rehearsal. </p> <p>If you use an archtop, definitely go for the acoustic lunch box. It's worth it to pay the difference. </p> <p>Peace </p>
PFDP on "ZT luchbox Jr. Good clean tone for practicing?" http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/topic/zt-luchbox-jr-good-clean-tone-for-practicing#post-11573
Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
Sat, 27 Jul 2013 15:20:46 +0000
PFDP 11573@http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/ <p>Hi,</p> <p>I need a really small amplifier with a good clean sound.</p> <p>I found the ZT Lunchbox jr. Has anyone try one?...For the price and the size ( nevermind the watts, it is just for practice in different places) if it has a good clean tone, it would be a good option.</p> <p>Bye. </p>