Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BPDB in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bpdb.php on line 183

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-object-cache.php on line 285

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 67

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http_Cookie in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 1633

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Users in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-users.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BP_Roles in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bp-roles.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Auth in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-auth.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 33

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Taxonomy in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-taxonomy.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 26

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::prefix() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 49

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
<br/> <b>Strict Standards</b>: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in <b>/home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php</b> on line <b>9</b><br/> D'angelico Nyss 3/ Nyss 3b vs. Ex-ss « The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum

D'angelico Nyss 3/ Nyss 3b vs. Ex-ss

(7 posts)

Tags:

  1. I played the D'angelico Ex-ss at a local shop and was surprised to find that it was fully hollow with a small solid block beneath the bridge. I was under the impression that both the Nyss 3 and the Ex-ss were 335 style with a solid block running the full length of the body. Can anyone with experience with the Nyss-3/3B tell me if it has a full length solid block or if it is fully hollow with a block beneath the bridge only. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

    Private
  2. JorgeRubiales
    Member

    AFAIK the nyss-3 is hollow with the "inserts" on bridge and neck.

  3. Thanks Jorge. Is there anyone on the forum that owns an Nyss 3 that can enlighten me? I've heard and read alot of speculation about this but I am unable to get a solid or definate answer.

    Admin
  4. Benny
    Member

    The NYSS3 has a block running through the body like a 335. The Excel SS was designed for D'Angelico by luthier Bill Commins and has a small block under the bridge and tailpiece only. By all accounts the Excel SS is an excellent guitar, only produced in limited quantities to date.

    I've seen plenty of discussion of these guitars on the RMMGJ discussion page, including comments from players who have these guitars. http://groups.google.com/group/rec.music.makers.guitar.jazz/browse_thread/thread/d2dc473dfc8cd03e/81e2552a4624104d?lnk=gst&q=d%27angelico#

  5. guitarua
    Member

    I have had an NYSS-3 for a few weeks now. It has a center block that runs through the body, like an es-335, but heavier IME.

  6. mitinite
    Member

    Hi everybody, I own a D'Angelico NYSS-3 (the one without tailpiece) and I'm considering to let it go.
    Anyone interested please contact me in order to ask anything about the guitar.
    I'm from Italy

  7. JPMike
    Member


Reply

You must log in to post.