Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BPDB in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bpdb.php on line 183

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-object-cache.php on line 285

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 67

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http_Cookie in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 1633

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Users in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-users.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BP_Roles in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bp-roles.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Auth in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-auth.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 33

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Taxonomy in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-taxonomy.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 26

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::prefix() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 49

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
<br/> <b>Strict Standards</b>: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in <b>/home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php</b> on line <b>9</b><br/> Inexpensive reverb unit « The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum
Email

Inexpensive reverb unit

(8 posts)
  1. Anyone got any suggestions for a decent and affordable natural sounding reverb unit/pedal for about $100?

  2. jorgemg1984
    Member

    Just get yourself 50 bucks more and a TC Electronics HOF... unbeatable for the price. The New Hardwire Supernatural also seems great but it's slightly more expensive.

  3. Yeah,hard to beat TC for anything.I know Digitech has a pedal for $50 cheaper,didn't sound bad for the price.

  4. jorgemg1984
    Member

    Yeah the small holy grail is on that price range too I think. But the 50 bucks more are really worth it... I just use two settings but they are very good. I mean Strymon is awesome but it's twice the price of the TC, I don't think you get twice the value. With the TC vs Digitech you will get 50$ the value for sure!

  5. Yeah,I think TC pretty much owns reverb and delay,for sure.Let me see the condition of my wallet in a couple of months...see if I can fatten it up for the TC unit : )

  6. jorgemg1984
    Member

    Ha Ha hope you can make it! :)

  7. smoke
    Member

    It just depends on how many features you need. If you just need a basic reverb sound and don't need a ton of features, there are many, many options if you can find them used - TC Electronics, Boss, Digitech, EXH, etc. If you need a ton of features, you are going to have to spend a bit more.

    The Digitech Hardwire series is the same brain as Lexicon, by the way. Hard to go wrong w/ Lexicon. They are really sturdy as well.

    You might be able to find an old Alesis half-rack reverb unit for cheap as well. I see them on Craigslist every so often.

    http://www.alesis.com/nanoverb

  8. bingefeller
    Member

    I have a Boss RV-5 which I really love.


Reply

You must log in to post.