Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BPDB in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bpdb.php on line 183

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-object-cache.php on line 285

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 67

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http_Cookie in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 1633

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Users in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-users.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BP_Roles in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bp-roles.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Auth in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-auth.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 33

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Taxonomy in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-taxonomy.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 26

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::prefix() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 49

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
<br/> <b>Strict Standards</b>: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in <b>/home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php</b> on line <b>9</b><br/> Kemper Profiling amps? « The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum
Contact us

Kemper Profiling amps?

(6 posts)
  1. jamacy77
    Member

    Dear Forum peeps,

    I've heard great things about the Kemper Profile amps.
    Some people prefer them than the Axe FX. Does anybody here have one? It seems very interesting/innovating.
    http://www.kemper-amps.com/home

    :-)

  2. kurtisrosenwinkel
    Administrator

    Kemper amp is great. I like it very much! the Axe FX is also great, i use them both recently together. I prefer the amp models in the Kemper and the effects and routing in the axe-fx.

  3. jamacy77
    Member

    Thanks Kurt!

    What type of footswitch are you using with it? I'm thinking about buying a Kemper. Also, are the delays and reverbs decent?

    Thanks

    Secret
  4. kurtisrosenwinkel
    Administrator

    i am using another cutting edge and revolutionary product from RJM called the Mastermin GT, a midi foot controller with silent switches and the ability to name all the buttons how you want on bright LED screens for each button, also with multiple pages possible. very easy to program and a pleasure to work with. this one unit has opened the whole world of midi control up for me.

    k

  5. kurtisrosenwinkel
    Administrator

    reverbs and delays on Kemper and indeed all the effects are great.

  6. jamacy77
    Member

    Thanks for your time and kindness, Kurt! The Kemper looks very cool. I had a chance to try one at Guitar Center in Boston, but there were lots of kids playing loud licks around me, so of course I couldn't have a clear idea of how the amp was sounding.

    I'll check the pedalboard out. The mastermind looks great! It's a bit expensive, but I'm sure it's worth it! The have different sizes. Time to invest some $$. I want a small rig, but yet efficient!

    Thanks again!
    Best,
    Gustavo


Reply

You must log in to post.