Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BPDB in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bpdb.php on line 183

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-object-cache.php on line 285

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 67

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http_Cookie in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 1633

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Users in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-users.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BP_Roles in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bp-roles.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Auth in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-auth.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 33

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Taxonomy in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-taxonomy.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 26

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::prefix() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 49

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
<br/> <b>Strict Standards</b>: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in <b>/home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php</b> on line <b>9</b><br/> Lage Lund new record... « The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum

Lage Lund new record...

(10 posts)
  1. Sandemose
    Member

  2. filters
    Member

    I think it's a good record. Lage's playing is so great on this one. But for some reasons I like more his quintet record.. Maybe because I like the sound of a quintet with sax more than "just" piano/guitar. But the compositions are interesting and Lage's so lyrical as usual.
    Such an incredible player.
    I'm waiting for the new Mike Moreno's because guitar+piano+vibes .. this is going to be rich harmonically !!!

  3. Quintricacy
    Member

    I checked it out today. While the playing on the record is really good, all the songs are all roughly in the same kind of tempo bandwidth-medium slow- medium and there is a very similar vibe to all of the tunes. That being said, I really enjoy Folly it has a nice groove and Lage really goes for it on this track.

  4. Matt
    Member

    i want to pick up one of his records. Which is better to start, any recommendation?

  5. filters
    Member

    early songs ... quintet record with marcus strickland and danny grissett ... great playing. some compositions and some standards.
    highly recommended !

  6. Sandemose
    Member

    Gonna check out "Early songs" soon. Thanks for the recommendation!

    Sandemose

  7. JtV
    Member

    Standards trio is also very good. Personally I always enjoy hearing guy of this caliber (rogers, rosenwinkel, lund) approach standards. I also agree that Early Songs is quite good...

  8. Colonel Trane
    Member

    I like the standards record and romantic latino as starting points because I like to hear the way they approach tunes I know first. I haven't listened all the way through unlikely stories but Folly is great.

  9. silverwater
    Member

    I really like the sound and overall vibe of "Unlikely Stories", and disagree with any of the criticism others have written. It's my favorite Lage recording.

    I've started working on the solo for the first tune, Swagger. Already I can tell that it's having a positive effect on my playing, especially the way he starts and ends some smaller phrases on the same note. As a listener that sort of melodicism is very engaging.

  10. Sandemose
    Member

    That you said about starting and ending on the same note sounds really intresting! Im gonna add that to the discussion about improvisation as well.

    Best, Sandemose


Reply

You must log in to post.