Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BPDB in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bpdb.php on line 183

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-object-cache.php on line 285

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 67

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http_Cookie in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 1633

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Users in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-users.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BP_Roles in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bp-roles.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Auth in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-auth.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 33

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Taxonomy in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-taxonomy.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 26

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::prefix() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 49

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
<br/> <b>Strict Standards</b>: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in <b>/home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php</b> on line <b>9</b><br/> Recording Software Question « The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum

Recording Software Question

(6 posts)
  1. Basile865
    Member

    I was wondering what recording software Kurt and everyone uses?

    If I wanted to explore a chord sequence, is there something I can use with a built in click to continuously loop the sequence?

    I was also wondering Kurt if you had a favorite mic(s) for your amp or if you do a DI type thing?

    Thanks

  2. Basile865
    Member

    Anyone have some suggestions? Im trying to get a system together to record an album

  3. themawt71
    Member

    i use pro tools on my mac book.

    it's great. you can definitely loop things. the sound is great.

    it wasnt too pricey either. i got the smallest mbox so i can only have two live inputs at a time. it was maybe 300 dollars. this was 5 years ago.

  4. Alvin
    Member

    Hey!

    Software-wise you can go by the so-called industry standard, which tends to be Pro Tools. But in my opinion an equal daw is Cubase.
    I use Presonus audio interface, which has good warm-sounding mic preamps. There is also a software called Studio One by Presonus, which is another very good alternative for the ones mentioned before. Some say there is a specific Pro Tools sound and a specific Cubase sound, but I definitely disagree with that. Just go with whatever you find appealing, they all get the work done!
    Audio interface-wise I'd go with Motu, RME (one of the best!) or Presonus. Maybe not so much with the Avid MBox stuff, cause it can have a slight digital nuance in the sound imho.

    Best,
    Alvin

  5. Basile865
    Member

    Great, thanks guys

  6. Nuno
    Key Master

    I have been using Ableton Live for the last 10 years or so for recording, mixing, multi-tracking, mastering & playing live also. I never looked back :)

    https://www.ableton.com/


Reply

Secret

You must log in to post.