Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BPDB in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bpdb.php on line 183

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-object-cache.php on line 285

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 67

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http_Cookie in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 1633

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Users in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-users.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BP_Roles in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bp-roles.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Auth in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-auth.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 33

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Taxonomy in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-taxonomy.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 26

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::prefix() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 49

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
<br/> <b>Strict Standards</b>: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in <b>/home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php</b> on line <b>9</b><br/> Regarding some functions on the message board « The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum

Regarding some functions on the message board

(6 posts)
  1. Sandemose
    Member

    Hi keymasters! Some questions, requests etc.

    1. Is it possible to extend the time in which one have to edit posts? It feels like its up to one hour or so now? Will those kind of functions slow down the site or something?

    2. Is it possible to add a "qoute" function when posting? That helps alot when you want to adress certain stuff someone in the beggining of the thread wrote.

    EDIT (<--aha?) 3. It would be cool if we could send PM to eachother here on the board as well. I dont always feel to confy (and I guess you erase posts containing personal emailadresses?) about showing my email in public.
    best wishes,

    Sandemose

    EDIT: And there we have another edit :)

    Thanks, Nuno! You´re doing a great job, and there really is no hurry. It would just make the forum even better. Aslo: I think the "tag" functions is really great as well.

    Best, Sandemose

    Email
  2. Nuno
    Key Master

    Hello Sandemose; see if can edit your posts now and report back to me please. will also try to develop the Quote system but i will need some time to do that.

    Thank´s for the input.

    Best

  3. Neither
    Member

    Hey,
    Sandemose,
    when you write tags, write them separated by a "," without space. If you don't, it appears like if it was only one tag. Here you should have wrote :
    edit,time,quote,functions
    As we can't change the tags after we enter them, it would help as it is made in order to make searches on this forum using keywords. Some of your agglomerated tags are cut because, I think, there is a limitation for the character's number. And it causes some problems on this page http://www.kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum : the tags are in alphabetical order, except of yours.
    you wrote :
    members playing homemade beutiful lov
    quartal fourth harmony improvisation stack lines standa
    And it appears on a single line.

    best regards

  4. Nuno
    Key Master

    Thanks Neither for the warning. i corrected Sandemose's tags. and everything is fine now :)

    Best

  5. Sandemose
    Member

    Yo, thanks alot neither! I had no clue. Nuno, perhaps insert that instruction beside where you fill in your tags? Thanks again for letting me know,

    Best, Sandemose

  6. Colonel Trane
    Member

    PM's would be great.


Reply

You must log in to post.