Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BPDB in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bpdb.php on line 183

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-object-cache.php on line 285

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 67

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http_Cookie in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 1633

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Users in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-users.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BP_Roles in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bp-roles.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Auth in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-auth.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 33

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Taxonomy in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-taxonomy.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 26

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::prefix() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 49

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
<br/> <b>Strict Standards</b>: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in <b>/home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php</b> on line <b>9</b><br/> Small Amp Recommendations « The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum

Small Amp Recommendations

(11 posts)

Tags:

  1. jazznan
    Member

    I'd like to get a small, lightweight amp to carry to gigs (tube) and around the $300 mark, any suggestions?

  2. wilmore
    Member

    Zt lunchbox. I use it for subway travel in nyc. Just know its a completely flat sound. Reverb pedal helps with that. Also good to practice with just guitar cable amp. Lets you know where your not holding your fingers down for long enough. Got mine for 250 usd.

  3. docbop
    Member

    Since you said tube a VHT Special 6, but probably not loud enough to gig with. Going to be hard to find tube amp gig worthy for $300. I'd second the ZT lunchbox suggestion.

  4. arewolfe
    Member

    Not a tube amp, but I'll throw in another vote for the ZT Lunchbox.

    I pair it with a Boss DD-4 delay on my solo gig. My main amp is a Fender Supersonic 1x12 which sounds good, but the weight sucks royally... 52 pounds. The ZT is 12 pounds and the carrying case is a shoulder bag which I find incredibly nice. I can carry all my gear at the same time and have my entire left hand and arm free to open doors, etc.

    It's a good practice amp. Crank the tone knob all the way up and play on the bridge pickup... the brightness is painfully revealing.

    Private
  5. wilmore
    Member

    Whoops. I was just in London and I thought tube meant subway.

  6. jorgemg1984
    Member

    The ZT Acoustic is a little more expansive but almost the same size and weight and it has full eq and reverb - and it is supposed to be better for jazz. I am getting one this summer when I go to NY.

    Contact us
  7. callum
    Member

    So how loud are these ZT jobbies? I'm in the market for a small amp as I just moved and have no amp. Your thoughts would be helpful!

  8. arewolfe
    Member

    Incredibly loud for the size. The Lunchbox is not something I'd use as a primary amp though. The tone isn't the best thing in the world, so I don't use a Lunchbox when I play with groups where I'm concerned about sounding as good as possible (with my trio, or with other small ensembles, or for recording). I use it on my solo gig out of sheer ease of transport... 12 pounds vs. 52-pound Fender Supersonic. I've used it basically every rehearsal I've had in the past 2 years.

    I've used it on indoor big band gigs, and it's loud enough even for that, which I thought was remarkable. Soloing in the big band I could have used a little more juice, but for 1 or 2 solos in a 2-hour gig it's still worth bringing the Lunchbox because it is so absurdly easy to carry. It probably would not be loud enough for outdoor big band gigs.

    It should be loud enough for almost any group of 4 people or less, it's just a matter of how much you're willing to compromise your sound. The tone is not the reason to buy the amp. It has a pretty bad ass tone considering the size and weight, but the real draw of this amp is that it pairs mediocre tone with insanely light weight and ease of transport.

  9. callum
    Member

    As much as I would love to consider tone as the most important factor, my budget doesn't really allow it.... I was playing through an ac15 before anyway (which I hated). This definitely seems like something to investigate, now I just have to find one in Germany

  10. jorgemg1984
    Member

    Mambo 8. Perfect solution for tone and portability.

  11. callum
    Member

    They look great, out of my price range unfortunately!


Reply

You must log in to post.