Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BPDB in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bpdb.php on line 183

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-object-cache.php on line 285

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 67

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http_Cookie in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 1633

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Users in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-users.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BP_Roles in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bp-roles.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Auth in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-auth.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 33

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Taxonomy in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-taxonomy.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 26

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::prefix() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 49

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
<br/> <b>Strict Standards</b>: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in <b>/home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php</b> on line <b>9</b><br/> Tonight's show! « The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum

Tonight's show!

(9 posts)

No tags yet.

  1. As you can see, my excitement lead to a double post, sorry.

  2. mikelorenz
    Member

    any reports about last nights show? new music? old stuff? would love to hear about it.

    Register
  3. Quintricacy
    Member

    there was 2 or 3 new ones, one was a completely rubato thing which was very cool. They also played Brooklyn Sometimes, A Shifting Design and two standards. Kurt was amazing as ever and Aaron had some moments too but it felt a little bit flat at times energy wise. Maybe it was just one of those nights. The highlight of the gig was the blues they played in the second set, Kurt played some of the best modern jazz guitar stuff ever.

  4. mikelorenz
    Member

    sounds good and thanks for the feedback. i'm thinking about going saturday night despite the usual crowded nature of the weekend sets. there's so much amazing music happening in NYC this weekend its hard to choose where to be!

  5. coltrane
    Member

    both nights i went kurt played arpestra, brooklyn sometimes, deja vu, bass place, song for r.c., and omage omich in the first set in that order. (not sure about spelling on some of those). the second set had a shifting design, a jackie byard blues tune i cant remember the name of that sounded a little like relaxin at camarillo, and a bunch of tunes I didn't recognize and weren't announced the night I stayed for the second set. I think its because the blues tune really took off and went on for something like 20 minutes and there either wasn't enough time for the last tune or kurt didn't want to follow that tune.

  6. coltrane
    Member

    o yea and he played under it all in the second set which was a pleasant suprise.

  7. Set Lists Wed. night -
    Set I
    Arpestra (spelling??)
    Brooklyn Sometimes
    Deja Vu
    Bass Place
    Omage Omich?? (spelling??) Ahmaj Ahmitch??

    Set II
    Spirit Kiss
    If I SHould Loose You
    Mrs. Parker Of KC (the blues recorded on a dolphy record)
    Under It All
    Song For RC (I think?? I didn't get the name and don't remember)
    A Shifting Design

    The rubato one - noted earlier in a post (perhaps)- was Bass Place...Kurt played it with the quartet that had Andrew D'Angelo in it last time he was at the vanguard, and it was almost COMPLETELY different!! Different band, different sound.

  8. Lasse S
    Member

    Thanks for this info .. The mistitled "Omage Omich" is called "Hommage a Mitch" - to Smalls-founder Mitch Borden .. And Song for RC is correct :)


Reply

You must log in to post.