Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BPDB in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bpdb.php on line 183

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-object-cache.php on line 285

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 67

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http_Cookie in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 1633

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Users in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-users.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BP_Roles in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bp-roles.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Auth in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-auth.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 33

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Taxonomy in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-taxonomy.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 26

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::prefix() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 49

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
<br/> <b>Strict Standards</b>: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in <b>/home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php</b> on line <b>9</b><br/> What is Kurt doing here? (blues content) « The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum
Private

What is Kurt doing here? (blues content)

(9 posts)
  1. fakejake
    Member

    Like gesture I have been coming back to practicing the blues lately, and I’m particularly interested in what harmonic modifications one can do to add a little more ‘volume’ and ‘density’ to the changes, especially when playing unaccompanied or just with bass or in a trio.
    In the clips below Kurt is demonstrating some awesome unaccompanied playing and I’d be really interested in what’s going on harmonically.
    I assume that he uses a lot of approach chords like diminished, secondary dominants and triton subs. While I’ve been using that concept to some success for Standards, I have a hard time doing the same thing with the blues, as in most cases the secondary dominants are identical to the preceeding chord anyway (I hope you get what I mean...) Any suggestions regarding specific extentions of voicings to use, or other substitution devices? I’m especially referring to Kurt’s playing in the second clip.
    Cheers!

    [+] Embed the video | Video DownloadGet the Video Player

    [+] Embed the video | Video DownloadGet the Video Player

  2. madsrh
    Member

    Fakejake -> This is amazing. If you've transcribed anything from these clips, please share it. I would also like to know what he's doing

    //MadsRH

  3. mrzzajjazz
    Member

    Hey!
    I started to transcribe the solo version of "Sandu" some years ago (second clip), but being really busy the past 2 years, I just did'nt finish it. Maybe I'll pick it up again (if I can find it) and then I'll let you guys know!

    -mrzzajjazz

  4. Chris
    Member

    Hey madsrh

    Good to see your alive! Whats the deal with your blog? I loved when it was up and running

    Admin
  5. fakejake
    Member

    Hey mrzzajjazz,
    Sounds great! If you find the transcription maybe upload it somewhere and post a link, so others can pick up on the work!

    Apart from that, I know that there are some pretty advanced players on this forum, maybe you guys could share some of your favorite subs in the context of blues!

  6. mrzzajjazz
    Member

    I found it!
    I actually had transcribed about half of it. Just send me your email, and I´ll share it with you. MadsRH- I also wonder what happened to your blog!

  7. fakejake
    Member

  8. drainard
    Member

  9. jseaberry
    Member

    Howdy Daniel, how are you? I check your site regularly, and thank you again for that marvelous book on Motivic Development. Outstanding.


Reply

You must log in to post.