Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BPDB in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bpdb.php on line 183

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-object-cache.php on line 285

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 67

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http_Cookie in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 1633

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Users in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-users.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BP_Roles in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bp-roles.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Auth in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-auth.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 33

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Taxonomy in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-taxonomy.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 26

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::prefix() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 49

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
<br/> <b>Strict Standards</b>: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in <b>/home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php</b> on line <b>9</b><br/> XOTIC X-Blender vs Lehle Parallel L « The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum

XOTIC X-Blender vs Lehle Parallel L

(4 posts)

Tags:

  1. djcuvcuv
    Member

    I am in the market to buy a parallel/bypass pedal such as the aforementioned. I can't find a comparison of the two anywhere and I was wondering if anyone has any experience with both and can give a comparison of two. Sound quality/integrity is my foremost concern.
    I know the Lehle is roughly 100 USD more expensive than the X-Blender, and it also does not have the EQ functionality like the X-Blender. Is the sound quality really so much better in the Lehle that despite it having less functionality than its competitor, it still sells for 100 USD more? What could account for the price disparity?

    Any and all info is much obliged.

    Thanks

  2. jorgemg1984
    Member

    Kurt is using these now I think

    http://www.thegigrig.com/acatalog/AFXL_WetBox.html

    The Lehle is good, never tried the Xotic.

  3. Joxo
    Member

    Hey
    Got the x-blender and unsed the Lehle. They are both good. Cant say thats they sound any diffrent wich is kind of the point. It`s a mixer ! Anyways the x-blenders have a booster and a Eq that is very usefull. For me anyways.

    By the way , i think a lot of people use them in the wrong way. The effect u sent in to it must be all wet . If its not you get phase issues.

    Good luck

    /J

  4. djcuvcuv
    Member

    Thanks for all the info guys. This does help. Because I intend of getting a standalone EQ pedal, and the WetBox is absurdly expensive, I think that the Lehle is my go to for the moment.

    Kurt, if you happen to stumble upon this thread, would you be willing to give me a quick breakdown of why you've used different parallel mixers and what your thoughts are on each? If you can recommend one which you feel has the highest quality, please do so.

    Thanks man


Reply

You must log in to post.