Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BPDB in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bpdb.php on line 183

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_el($output) in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bb-walker.php on line 148

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-object-cache.php on line 285

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 67

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http_Cookie in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-http.php on line 1633

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Users in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-users.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class BP_Roles in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.bp-roles.php on line 11

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Auth in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-auth.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 33

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Taxonomy in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/class.wp-taxonomy.php on line 36

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 26

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::prefix() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/class.bp-options.php on line 49

Strict Standards: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in /home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php on line 9
<br/> <b>Strict Standards</b>: Non-static method BP_Options::get() should not be called statically in <b>/home/actidemann/kurtrosenwinkel.com/forum/bb-includes/backpress/functions.bp-options.php</b> on line <b>9</b><br/> ZT luchbox Jr. Good clean tone for practicing? « The Kurt Rosenwinkel Forum

ZT luchbox Jr. Good clean tone for practicing?

(5 posts)

No tags yet.

  1. PFDP
    Member

    Hi,

    I need a really small amplifier with a good clean sound.

    I found the ZT Lunchbox jr. Has anyone try one?...For the price and the size ( nevermind the watts, it is just for practice in different places) if it has a good clean tone, it would be a good option.

    Bye.

  2. jamacy77
    Member

    Dear PFDP,

    I own two ZT amps, the acoustic Lunchbox
    http://www.ztamplifiers.com/products/lunchbox_acoustic.html

    and the one for electric guitars.
    http://www.ztamplifiers.com/products/lunchbox.html

    I don't know the jr. model.

    For what they are, I'd say they're great amps for low volume and practicing. However, I'd NEVER bring that to a concert or a louder rehearsal.

    If you use an archtop, definitely go for the acoustic lunch box. It's worth it to pay the difference.

    Peace

  3. arewolfe
    Member

    They are great amps. I use mine on my solo gig because it's 40 pounds lighter than my Supersonic. Definitely suitable for practicing.

  4. PFDP
    Member

    Thanks guys,

    I asked about the jr because it is so small and portable that is very suitable for what I need, But I hate those small amps with horrible sound.

    For playing live I use a Henriksen or a twin reverb ( lately always the Henriksen because of the weight).

    So what I looking for it is just a very small amp to practice alone, with a backing track maybe. The Jr is the smaller and cheaper of the ZT models...

    I have an archtop and a semihollow, but as I said...it is for practicing use only!!! :-)

  5. jamacy77
    Member

    I would get the acoustic Lunchbox if I were you...but... give it a try before you buy.


Reply

You must log in to post.